R. Paul McCarty wrote: > > Mark Willis wrote: > > > > As I've been in the aerospace biz, and know that G-force sensors are > > relatively cheap nowadays (used for Automobile Airbags, for one thing, > > so they're a mass market item not a custom sensor anymore, thus a lot > > cheaper) so a thought comes to mind; Partially from Steve Mann's & > > other folks' posts. (I haven't lived with a HUD yet, but this is an > > intriguing thought to me...) > > > > <Warning, TechSpeak follows> > > > > The thought of having my Linux system watch a 3-axis accelerometer and > > shift to lower heads-up display resolution automagically when I am in > > motion, then shift back up to higher resolution when I am at relative > > rest for over 30 seconds, has come to me. (Place the sensors in the > > belt or on the vest, not on my heads-up display, BTW, so this can work > > right!) This way, if I am walking, the display resolution can go down > > to 60 or 40 characters & to "essential information only" mode; If I sit > > down to do some text editing (coding, look at my schedule, whatever) I > > have high resolution. A simple asymmetrical digital low-pass filter > > could be used to change the X, Y, Z inputs (read peak values, 4 times a > > second or so?) then square & sum them into a gate value to determine > > whether I am "moving" enough or not (I'd want 3-4 seconds of movement > > before a shift down, and 30 seconds or so of stopping before a shift up > > in resolution when I stopped; I imagine the resolution shifts could be > > distracting if they happened more often! But maybe do a quicker shift > > up in resolution, if I'd only moved for less than 15 seconds, so if I > > answer the telephone here I can get it & be in high-res mode.) > > > > <TechSpeak ends> > > <Friendly criticism and mocking your idea begins> > > It doesn't sound too undoable, but ctrl-alt-+/- is pretty easy to type > to change resolutions if your are running X. If you are in text mode, I > don't think changing columns is very easy to do, and may not be possible > without some serious kernel hacking. Although I remember some sort of > display program that lets you switch text modes. > > There's also the problem of what happens when you are riding a moving > object, like an escalator or a train? wouldn't it think you were moving > really fast and switch to an undesireable mode? > > <Friendly criticism and mocking your idea ends> > > -Paul > > -- > R. Paul McCarty / DARS Coordinator // x52059 > 317 Lattimore Hall, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 > Computers don't make errors; what they do, they do on purpose.-Dale/KOTH I've been mostly planning on the P5 (which driver isn't written yet) - I don't have experience with a Twiddler, I'd wonder how easy Ctrl-Alt-+- will be to type on a twiddler. I haven't used X (yet, focusing on just learning Linux thoroughly before I add X, as I only use Windows to print on WinTel machines.) My girlfriend's disabled, and partially I'm thinking of this for her, partially for me, just have a machine "do it" without my having to always bother with the keyboard is really a good thing from MY point of view (I have enough to remember to do without having to remember to change display resolutions!) as well as from hers (she can hardly type at all, hers may have to be voice-recognition based, and to keep telling her machine to Resolution Change can sap her energy, but it can do it automatically & she can cope.) I just discussed trains off someone else's post (As good a point from you as from him!) - Elevators. Hmmm, that's another special case I haven't been thinking about. I'd think treating an elevator ride as a movement (i.e. shift to lower res) would be an acceptable answer, but that'd be configurable I think. If she's riding an elevator she's usually paying attention to her service dog, so she'd want it to stay in low resolution mode. Elevators aren't the safest places to do computer work for women, either, though I wouldn't know; I'm rather tall & male... This might just work for some folks, not for others. I'll think on it! Mark Willis
![]()
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail