Return to the archive index

Re: What are the obstacles?

From: Brian Rudy <>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:51:57 -0800

Vaughan Pratt wrote:
> 
> >To a novice like me the hurdles would seem small.  Instead of designing the
> >motherboard layout to be thin and wide taking up the length of the portable's
> >innards it would be fat and compact taking up a drive bay space.  Instead of
> >spreading the ram slots, graphics board, keyboard and other connections around
> >they would be concentrated in the drive bay area.  Slide the wearable in and
> >it connects to the screen, keyboard, hd, etc.
> 
> A 166MHz Pentium with 32MB (std.) DRAM from Cell Computing fits this
> spec to a T.  This is an SMOS clone (wrt to physical form factor ---
> Type III --- and pinout --- 236 pins along the long side) that's ahead
> of SMOS wrt performance (SMOS is currently only at 586, no Pentium yet)
> and off-the-shelf-ness (SMOS uses custom parts, Cell uses standard
> components including a standard notebook SO-DIMM which the user can
> easily upgrade to 128MB---I'm currently using 64MB in mine).  Now if
> only Cell had included a 32MB flash!

I agree, the CardPC product allows for upgradability, and has a tiny
form factor. We managed to squeeze a 2.5" HD, PC-104 PCMCIA card,
Intelec carier board, P200 CardPC and ISR into a 2"x4.8"x6.8" package
that is user-upgradable. 

-- 
Brian Rudy 
Engineering Operations Manager
The Tech Museum of Innovation

Voice: 	(408) 795-6157
Fax:	(408) 279-7167
http://www.thetech.org

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail