Return to the archive index

Where is the Apple II of wearables?

From: Bill Nordstrom <>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 15:48:23 +0100

First, my life story-

My interest in wearables is strictly to simplify my life.  I am, however, one
of those people that will spend several weeks learning, customizing, or
programming if necessary to save a few minutes a day on a routine or annoying
task.  I bought a Newton to have a mobile, digital data source and found it
too large to carry and too time consuming to flip open, power up, and write
down notes while on the move.  So, naturally I became interested in a more
persistent remembrance agent and became drawn to wearables.  More concerned
with simplifying my life than programming face recognition routines I have
very narrow desires for a starting wearable.  Mainly I want to combine the
following modern day encumbrances:

1. A mobile phone
2. A walkman- a necessity in my view.
3. Organizer
4. Address/phonebook
5. Maps
6. Memo pad

Now for my world vision-

Beyond my own selfish concerns I believe the above list represents the
closest, realizable amalgam of consumer products that will constitute a real
platform for wearable computing.  The other existing attempts- computer
watches, computer phones, etc...  have no growth room.

I have been surprised that the wearable community has not yet spawned the
wearable equivalent of the Apple II- simple, cheap, expandable in purpose.
Where is the startup company working on this product?

The above device wouldn't require much more than a combination of a Star-tac
phone, a PMCIA card slot, a Voice-It memo recorder, a touch sensitive
interface, and a cpu capable of playing mp3 files and java apps.  Presently,
these devices altogether can't weigh more than 2 lbs with all the redundant
plastic casing and unconsolidated circuitry and each device has a near day
long battery life.

Why java?  I picked java because it is the most inviting language to the
novice computer enthusiast, its got the PR for the most
network-exploitablilty, and unless I'm misinformed it was designed originally
for small appliance-type devices.

Why the mp3 (or pick another comparable digital music format) capability?
More people own walkmans than phones, computers, or organizers.  We need to be
seeding wearables into the hands of youthful gadget enthusiasts to gain a
following and robust developer community.

As I see it, the emphasis on HMD in the wearable community is stifling the
emergence of this crucial product.  I don't know many people that are
dependent on a camcorder all day long.  Sure, I would love an unobtrusive,
nonstop visual data feed all day.  I would love to video conference with my
wife while shopping, but that is a wish presently, and not a need in most
peoples minds.

Finally, please don't take my comments the wrong way.  I am always glad that
someone is thinking 10 or 20 years ahead.  I'm just frustrated that what
should be here now isn't.  If anyone knows of a good startup company that is
working toward this ideal, please send me some info.

--
Bill Nordstrom
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75235-9039
W:214-648-9227
Fax: 214-648-8694
email 
Cooltalk:  129.112.20.190

Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail