Return to the archive index

Re: Automotive Displays (was: WearCam/Comp v. The Bigs)

From: "Timothy Gray" <>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 19:42:12 -0400

Umm, if you are the witness of a crime, I.E. police beating someone, your
device will be ripped from your head and stomped on. It has happened to many
people who have cought police violating a persons rights, the only reason we
ever saw the rodney king tape was because it was filmed from a distance,
inside a house where an officer cannot easily relieve the videotaper of
their rights, and it was released to the Media before the police department,
as it would have "dissappeared".  There is a tiny tv station here in my
town, and when they started to create a news department it was commonplace
for the police to relieve the reporters of their equipment including tape,
"for the good of the public" and it was considered evidence. It took 2 years
and a lawsuit for them to get the equipment back, the tapes were
mysteriously erased (Must have stored them wrong in the evidence room) and
the cameras looked like they were dragged back to the station behind the
patrol car. Remember, if you plan on videotaping anything be ready to run
like hell as the police, security guard, others will beat the crap out of
you to get the equipment and tape. We were most successful getting news
footage when a major network station was taping also, that way we were
protected by the resources and  "live" abilities of the networks.

>> at least there's evidence if you're pulled over and falsely accused of
>> something, or like when someone's pulled from a car and beaten...
>
>Unfortunately, my apparatus blocks my field of vision so much that it is
>illegal to drive while wearing it...  Though I ripped the cup-holder out
>of my car, and hope to mount a small monitor in front of the gearshift
>in its place when I have a bit more money...
>
>I've thought about trying to reflect a monitor off of the inside of the
>windshield, but I figure this wouldn't work very well, and if I hit
>something, it would probably fly through the windshield/people's heads.
>
>What I'd really like to build, though, is a transparent display inside
>of my helmet for use in motorcycle racing...  It is rather scary to be
>ripping down the road much faster than you should be and have to look
>down at the insturmentation (I currently don't have that problem,
>though, as my speedometer is broken :) (Along with something in the
>engine; I think I may have blown a gasket).  Hopefully when retinal
>displays are available to the public, this will be possible.
>
>On that topic, I have heard (second-hand) that Sony will soon be
>releasing a retinal display that will cost ~$400.  Is this true?
>
>--
>Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
>"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
>Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org
>

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail