It'd be handy but that cable makes it hard to walk far <G> I use 10Base2, myself. PCMCIA access to the LAN on occasion, maybe? I'd vote for: "Mandatory": IDE or SCSI, or PCMCIA instead; VGA (for debugging, it'd be OK if that was capable of being powered down unless in use!) 2 or more serial ports, 4 desireable (PCMCIA modem is fine for me, have a 56k Hayes) parallel port access somehow (PCMCIA card, worst case, but built-in lets you use Parallel port CD-ROMs, SCSI adapters, etc.) "Would be nice": PCMCIA (2 slots with the top one capable of taking a type III HD) Personally, I'd pass on floppy access (Too little data, too much power & bulk & too many problems; Give me PCMCIA instead! 40+ Mb in a smaller, faster package. More expensive, I agree. Worth it.) Or I'd pull the HD & plug it into an adapter & use a parallel port adapter or a desktop machine to move the data; Either's more reliable & faster than floppies, in my experience. (Maybe I just have bad luck with floppies.) Mark WillisMartin Lightheart wrote: > > Hi all, > > I don't this question has been posted before, but here goes, is it > desireable to have ethernet on a wearable or not? That is, a 10baseT > connector. Or is better to have an IR port that uses ethernet? > > Also, which interfaces (ide, floppy, vga, serial port, parallel port, etc) > would one want on a wearable? > > Martin
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail